trinities: (bitchface.)
Nena Trinity ([personal profile] trinities) wrote2009-11-07 10:11 pm

33.

So Lockon, if the problem was it was on some little kid's post, be a man and step up now!

(( Assume all relevant KILLING PEOPLE CELESTIAL BEING WTF bits of comments are under CB-lock, we kind of forgot :'D ))
lockon2urheart: (we're goin' round in circles)

[personal profile] lockon2urheart 2009-11-08 12:21 pm (UTC)(link)
And how exactly were the civilians at that wedding in Spain standing in the way of the Trinity interventions, Nena? The way you were given your orders doesn't excuse you from anything, this is basic morality!

You want to know what it is I'd like to hear? Any indication of the redeeming qualities Tieria seems to see in you and Michael - as far as I can see, there's nothing in either of you two that'd invite trust or effort at all. I stand by what I said to Tieria: the more I talk to you both, the more convinced I get.

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com 2009-11-08 04:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Lockon, you're wilfully misunderstanding now. You're completely missing the fact that the Trinitys had never had any sense of morality installed in the first place. Nena had no idea that what she did that day was wrong! But I have since explained it to her, and she understands now that she should not have done that.

And before you say "she only knows it's wrong because you told her so", you are mistaken!

Nena Trinity! Explain to Lockon Stratos, in detail, why attacking that wedding was wrong.

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com 2009-11-08 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
You see that, Lockon? I believe that is what you would call empathy. Something that a psychopath does not possess! As such, your reasoning is flawed.

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com 2009-11-08 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Nena, don't bring that up, please...

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com 2009-11-08 04:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you.
lockon2urheart: (well there goes the neighbourhood)

[personal profile] lockon2urheart 2009-11-08 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)
You've taught her to spout off the moral codes of a five year old, Tieria. She's a teenager. If you're trying to impress me, it's not working.

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com 2009-11-08 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
That she's a teenager.
Edited 2009-11-08 20:44 (UTC)
lockon2urheart: (gdi tieria)

[locked]

[personal profile] lockon2urheart 2009-11-08 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Well if she actually was five years old, I might see the satisfaction in getting her to act like one. What're you getting at, Tieria?
Edited 2009-11-08 20:55 (UTC)

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com 2009-11-08 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I apologize, then. It seems I'm a year out.

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com 2009-11-08 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)
You know exactly what I am implying. She is six years old.

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com 2009-11-08 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)
She took her first unassisted breath approximately six years ago. She opened her eyes approximately six years ago. She entered the world of human contact approximately six years ago.

However you want to put it, that is the rough period of time.
lockon2urheart: (this shit is bananas)

[locked]

[personal profile] lockon2urheart 2009-11-08 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)
...I don't think this is the clarification you meant it to be, you know. If Nena's six, then Michael's what, seven? Eight? And both of them look pretty clearly into their teenage years. If there's more detail to this, you're going to have to give me at least a hint here.

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com 2009-11-08 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
That sounds about right for Michael, yes.

Specify what you would like more detail on.
lockon2urheart: (can't do it/its really not my cup of tea)

[locked]

[personal profile] lockon2urheart 2009-11-08 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
...We could start with why they look as old as they do and move on to why Michael especially has the sex drive of about ten teenagers if he's actually eight.

Is this more of a technical age that you're talking about, here?

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com 2009-11-08 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Due to their natural aging rather than... anything else, I can only presume that they are physiologically normal. Well, as normal as somebody like Allelujah, for example.

Yes, a technical age. I suppose you could say that they're teenagers with the first twelve years of their lives missing, but for the purposes of your argument on morality, they are children.
Edited 2009-11-08 23:03 (UTC)

[locked]

[personal profile] lockon2urheart - 2009-11-08 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com - 2009-11-09 00:03 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[personal profile] lockon2urheart - 2009-11-09 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com - 2009-11-09 00:36 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[personal profile] lockon2urheart - 2009-11-10 12:57 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com - 2009-11-10 13:02 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[personal profile] lockon2urheart - 2009-11-10 13:12 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com - 2009-11-10 13:22 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[personal profile] lockon2urheart - 2009-11-10 13:33 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com - 2009-11-10 13:47 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[personal profile] lockon2urheart - 2009-11-10 14:03 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com - 2009-11-10 15:30 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[personal profile] lockon2urheart - 2009-11-10 15:59 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com - 2009-11-10 16:28 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[personal profile] lockon2urheart - 2009-11-10 16:44 (UTC) - Expand

[locked]

[identity profile] nonesodangerous.livejournal.com - 2009-11-10 16:47 (UTC) - Expand